Ngā Kereme o Ngāti Whakaue
Ngāti Whakaue Claims

Claims

A critical aspect of the Treaty Settlement process is that the Crown does not negotiate individual claims, but rather engages with groups that have been mandated to represent the collective interests of an iwi, hapū, or other recognised group.

This approach is meant to ensure that settlements are comprehensive and enduring. Securing an iwi mandate is essential because it demonstrates that the group has the authority to negotiate on behalf of all its members, unifying their claims into one clear, united negotiation with the Crown. Without this mandate, individual claims can’t be dealt with in the settlement process.

CLAIMAREACLAIMANT
WAI 1101

2003
Maketū Peninsula
A claim by descendants of the tipuna Haerehuka in regards to lands comprising the Maketū peninsula and surrounds, in the matter of land consolidation, schemes under the Native land Act1909 and its amendments.
Henry McRae, Te Uira Reg Naera, Grace Dorset

Principle whānau representative:
Norma Sturley

Maru Tapsell
WAI 676

1997
Te Awa o Ngatoroirangi
Part settled by TPT – but pertains to Te Arawa being affected by the actions of the Crown in the vesting of parts of Te Awa o Ngatoroirangi in the Tauranga City Council.
Raewyn Bennett
WAI 1475Ownership of Maketū A Sec 72
Descendants of Ieni Hans andand Te Ao Kore Warangi relates to original ownership of the block by Ieni Hans Tapsell.
Theresa Ngawaka Horne, Te Wano Walters, Maru Tapsell, Hone Ihaka Devon
WAI 325

1992
Ownership of Maketū A Sec 72
Failure to thoroughly investigate the original owner interests before passing Sect 8 (1) of the Native Land Act 1934 granting Waihi No.6 in breach of Article 2 of the Treaty of Waitangi.
Clem Tapsell
WAI 1791

2008
Maketū, Whareama and Little Waihi
Relates to breaches in the claims area of Maketū, Whareama and Little Waihi.
Huia Tapsell
Jackie Butcher
Clem Tapsell
Larissa Wharepouri and Gilly Parker
WAI 2147

2008
Lands taken under the Maketū Land Consolidation Act
Relates to lands taken under the Maketū Land Consolidation Act.
Richard Whenuariri Tapsell, Te Wano Walters, Joan Waterreus, Maria Brenda Horne
ROTORUA CLAIMS
WAI 1883

2008
Waimihia Waingaehe Lands claim
Relates to grievances that occurred within the traditional boundaries of Ngāti Whakaue and the geographical area from Waimihia in the west to Waingaehe on the southern shores of Lake Rotorua.
Anaru Te Amo
Paul Tapsell
WAI 410*Te Kouramawhitiwhiti No 1 and Te Wharau a Tahora Whakarua
Acquisition of the lake frontage land specifically to lands known as above, which relates to WAI 94 Ngāti Whakaue Endowment lands that were being negotiated at the time.
Hamuera Walker Mitchell
WAI 1963
Alienation of Pukeroa Hill
Effect of the 1993 settlement agreement with the Crown and the subsequent grievance created that impacts certain sections of Ngāti Whakaue.
Hamuera Walker Mitchell
WAI 335*

WAI 268
Geothermal Resource
Failure by the Crown to protect customary geothermal resource within Ngāti Whakaue boundaries. Wrongful taking of the geothermal resource by the Crown under various legislation, in particular breaches under the Thermal Springs District Act 1881.
Hamuera Taiporutu Mitchell and others
WAI 2227
Motutara Peninsula
Relates to wrongful acquisition of ancestral lands andand hereditaments of Ngāti Hurungaterangi lands located on what is known as Pukeroa Oruawhata block and more particularly the areas of Government Gardens, the Blue Baths and the Polynesian Pools
Edward Herewini Mutu
WAI 1881
Ngāti Whakaue Taonga
All Taonga acquired by the Crown and its agents, those sitting in collections housed in NZ Museums
Te Kiri Wheroewa Mitchell

Aleisha Mitchell

WAI 1204*
Ngongotahā MaungaKanohi Mohoao Wiliata
WAI 316*
Mamaku Railway Lands
Failure by the Crown to utilise the land ngā hapū provided for the construction of a railway for the benefit of the district, residents and hapū.
Nirai Manahi
Ngāti Pukaki, Ngāti Rautao, Ngāti Waoku, Ngāti Hika, Ngāti Ririu, and Ngāti Karenga
WAI 317Whakarewarewa and Horohoro State Forests
Wrongful acquisition by the Crown of the greater part of Ngāti Whakaue lands and interests in particular 2 forests
Hamuera Taiporutu Mitchell and others
WAI 384
Ohinemutu Village (Imposition of Rates)
Crown’s failure to apply the terms of the Rotorua Township Agreement in terms of recognising Ōhinemutu Village as a Kāinga Māori – not being subject to rating under all rating legislation since 1880.

Anaru Te Amo
WAI 533*
WAI 268
Whakarewarewa Geothermal Valley and State Forest Whakarewarewa No 3Te Au Nikora, Hokimatemai Kahukiwa, Tobias Hona
WAI 1357
Estate of Rotohiko Haupapa
Loss of lands and prejudice as a result of Native Land Court and Crown Purchasing.
Tony Paretene Haupapa, Terrence Raniera Phillips
WAI 2286
Application of legislation and policies
Relates to consolidation schemes, settlement of railway lands, legislation and Native land Court actions. Ngāti Rangiiwaho and Te Arawhata Taro whānau.
Cynthia Ngahuiatapu Smith
WAI 2083
Owhatiura Land blocks
Lands alienated by the Crown, including Puketawhero Recreation Reserve, the old abattoir site, the Owhatiura Hill and surrounds including Te Ngae Shopping Centre – by Public Works Act, Rating Act and Acts of Parliament and subsequent policies.
Hiwinui Heke replaced by Matt Heke
WAI 2459
Rika Whānau Land Claim
Actions or inactions as the case may be, has disadvantaged the Rika whānau from occupying and developing the whenua.
Walter Rika
WAI 2296
Mere Tira Kahurangi Lands
Rights and interests that were alienated, denied, excluded and lost to her descendants as a result of Crown actions and omissions.
David (Rawiri Stephens)
WAI 2505
Niramona Pini Land Act (circa 1896)
Actions of the Crown that allowed this Act to illegally transfer ownership of the Utanga block at Ōhinemutu to private interests and then onto the Crown.
Ben Manley

Claims can be categorised as:

Land Loss

Loss of lands and prejudice as a result of Native Land Court and Crown Purchasing Relates to Consolidation.

Schemes, settlement of railway lands, legislation and Native land Court actions.

Forestry

Categorised under Land Loss.

Geothermal Resources

Failure by the Crown to protect customary geothermal resources within Ngāti Whakaue boundaries.

Wrongful taking of the geothermal resource by the Crown under various legislation, in particular the Thermal Springs District Act 1881.

Rotorua Township Agreement

Effects of the 1993 settlement agreement with the Crown and impact of the informal amendment to WAI 94.

Crown Relationship

Continued failures by the Crown to honour the agreements, relationships and generosity of ngā hapū o Ngāti Whakaue terms of land taken, behaviour of its agents in the acquisition of lands – these failures in itself contributed hugely to the loss of land, our tūpuna rangatira loss of mana, breakdown of our tribal structures.

Understanding the difference between hapū and whānau claims

Hapū and whānau claims refer to the different levels at which grievances against the Crown may be lodged, based on historical breaches of the Treaty.

Whānau Claim

A whānau claim is usually about a grievance raised by a family group. They are generally more focused on specific, personal grievances that may not require large-scale redress. In Treaty settlements, these claims tend to be smaller and focus on specific issues, like injustices or breaches of the Treaty of Waitangi that directly affected the family, their lands, rights, or resources. They might also involve things like land loss or specific actions by the Crown that impacted the whānau.

Hapū Claim

These claims cover bigger issues than whānau claims, often involving significant losses or grievances around land, resources, and rights that affected the whole hapū. These claims usually deal with larger-scale breaches by the Crown, like land confiscations, loss of fishing or forestry rights, or other breaches that impacted the ability of the hapū to thrive economically and socially. Hapū claims typically involve larger-scale negotiations and settlement processes.